Patrick’s Poem

This poem, which was taken from Stephen Chbosky’s novel entitled The Perks of Being a Wallflower. This is the poem that Charlie (the protagonist) gave his friend Patrick at the end of the Secret Santa party. Charlie remembered the poem from his friend Michael who committed suicide.

It’s been a long time since a piece of writing has influenced my mood this greatly. I hope that you will take the time to read it through and really let it sink in. For all those people that have never contemplated or attempted suicide, maybe it will give you a deeper appreciation for those that have. For all those people that have, maybe it will strike compassion.



Once on a yellow piece of paper with green lines
     he wrote a poem
And he called it “Chops”
     because that was the name of his dog
And that’s what it was all about
And his teacher gave him an A
     and a gold star
And his mother hung it on the kitchen door
     and read it to his aunts
That was the year Father Tracy
     took all the kids to the zoo
And he let them sing on the bus
And his little sister was born
     with tiny toenails and no hair
And his mother and father kissed a lot
And the girl around the corner sent him a
     Valentine signed with a row of X’s
     and he had to ask his father what the X’s meant
And his father always tucked him in bed at night
And was always there to do it

Once on a piece of white paper with blue lines
     he wrote a poem
And he called it “Autumn”
     because that was the name of the season
And that’s what it was all about
And his teacher gave him an A
     and asked him to write more clearly
And his mother never hung it on the kitchen door
     because of its new paint
And the kids told him
     that Father Tracy smoked cigars
And left butts on the pews
And sometimes they would burn holes
That was the year his sister got glasses
     with thick lenses and black frames
And the girl around the corner laughed
     when he asked her to go see Santa Claus
And the kids told him why
     his mother and father kissed a lot
And his father never tucked him in bed at night
And his father got mad
     when he cried for him to do it

Once on a paper torn from his notebook
     he wrote a poem
And he called it “Innocence: A Question”
     because that was the question about his girl
And that’s what it was all about
And his professor gave him an A
     and a strange steady look
And his mother never hung it on the kitchen door
     because he never showed her
That was the year that Father Tracy died
And he forgot how the end
     of the Apostle’s Creed went
And he caught his sister
     making out on the back porch
And his mother and father never kissed
     or even talked
And the girl around the corner
     wore too much makeup
That made him cough when he kissed her
     but he kissed her anyway
     because that was the thing to do
And at three a.m. he tucked himself into bed
     his father snoring loudly

That’s why on the back of a brown paper bag
     he tried another poem
And he called it “Absolutely Nothing”
Because that’s what it was really all about
And he gave himself an A
and a slash across each damned wrist
And he hung it on the bathroom door
     because this time he didn’t think
     he could reach the kitchen

Maybe the education department needs an IEP

Today proved to be one of complete frustration. It simply didn’t start off very well. I had an argument with Professor C.K. (I refuse to call her “Dr.” as she hasn’t earned it in my mind). Here’s a quick synopsis of the verbal transaction.

Firstly, she stated that IEPs didn’t have to be written following the “deficiency model,” which I’m sure is a title that she made up on-the-fly. She meant that IEPs didn’t have to address a student’s deficiencies directly. I quickly retorted that the PLEP didn’t have to address deficiencies, but that the goals pages did, as that was the purpose of the form.

Secondly, she said that the goals didn’t have to be worded in such a way that they seemed like deficiencies. To that, I seeked clarification by asking “so, you’re saying that the goals pages address deficiencies but they don’t have to be worded as such?” She said yes, and I responded by saying “so you would rather address the problems indirectly. The problem is there, but you’d rather make the wording ‘pretty,’ which is very PC?” Then Professor KC raised her voice to the point that other students called it “yelling,” and said “It’s not PC, IT’S RIGHT!”

Thirdly, as if she hadn’t already proven her inability to discuss a topic like an adult, she abruptly ended the conversation and “moved on to another topic.” To me, that does nothing more that signify an acceptance of academic defeat and a lack of respect for a student’s legitimate question. Apparently it is unacceptable to disagree with her. Not to mention she used her “years of experience” as emperical justification of her position.

Regarding a separate but equally unnerving issue, Professor C.K. demonstrated the complete lack of communication between the students and members of the (un)education department. A few seniors have yet to take the CBASE exam, and they were told that they needed to take it before the start of the next semester. However, the results have to be in before the start of the next semester. The only way for that to happen would be to take it in September, which has already come and gone.

While the maladroit education department, in and of itself is annoying, Professor C.K.’s next plan of action was downright asinine. She felt that it was necessary to “report” (aka “tattle”) to Dr. C.S. about our “behaviours” today. With regard to handling a situation in an adult manner, way to go Cathie!

The only thing that today’s experience proves to me is that the education department at University is simply living off of its name. The only thing they know how to do well is make potentially great teachers with a passion for educating want to go into a different field.

|:| Zach |:|

Oh, the injustices of the world

Today in the paper there were two criminal columns right next to one another. In the first, a man was convicted of breaking and entering, assault with a deadly weapon, sexual misconduct, and grand theft. He was given five years. In the next column, a man was convicted of having child pornography on his computer. I’m not sure of the actual content, but he was sentenced to forty years.

While I am completely against child pornography, I guess I fail to see how that “crime” was so much worse than the man represented in the first column. Not only that, but the man in the first column can get out on probation and possibly continue to live a normal life. The second man, however, will be listed on the blackened and taboo “Sex-offenders List” for the rest of his days. That type of stigma will haunt the man until death.

Not that I am the official source on ethics or justice, but I feel that my opinion is equally as valid as anyone else’s, given that I backed it with supporting evidence.

Just a slice of classic American apple pie (metaphorically speaking, of course).

|:| Zach |:|